Sir Chandrasekhar Venkata Raman - C V Raman – holds the unique distinction of being the first Asian and the first non-white to win the coveted Nobel Prize in Sciences and the one and only Indian Scientist to win the Nobel Prize in Physics, in 1930, for the discovery of the effect, known after his name - The Raman Effect. CV Raman was born on 7th November, 1888 in a small town of Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu.
Imagine you shine a light on an object, and most of that
light simply bounces back, but a small part of the light changes its colour
(wavelength) slightly and this change is dependent on the nature of the
molecules with which it interacts. This change in color or the wavelength of
the scattered light is what we call the Raman Effect. When light interacts with
molecules, some of the light’s energy can cause the molecules to vibrate or
move. These vibrations can make the scattered light change its colour or
wavelength. By studying this change, scientists can learn a lot about the
molecules and their behaviour, which causes this change. In simple
terms, Raman Effect is like our unique ADHAR card number, which establishes each
of our identities based on our fingerprint and iris scan. Raman Effect is a
fingerprint of molecules, helping scientists understand the world at a tiny,
molecular level by looking at how light interacts with these molecules.
Raman was born on 7th November 1888 in the small town of Tiruchirappalli,
Tamil Nadu to R. Chandrasekhar Iyer and Parvathi Ammal. Interestingly enough Raman
did not begin his career as a professional scientist, rather, like most other
brilliant students of the era, he too was attracted to the Indian Civil Service
(ICS), which unfortunately he could not undertake owing to the medical restrictions
for his travel to England to appear for the ICS exam. He chose the next best
option and succeeded in becoming the Assistant Accountant General in the
colonial Indian Finance Department in Calcutta in 1907 and served this post for
nearly a decade before resigning from the post to start his full-time career as
a Palit Professor in Physics at the Calcutta University in 1917. During the
period from 1907 to 1917, Raman worked part-time at the Indian Association for
the Cultivation of Science, where he pursued his research and passion for
science. Raman had barely worked for 13 years as a regular and professional
scientist, before receiving his coveted Nobel Prize at a relatively young age
of 41 years, and that too singularly. Raman pushed those barriers of colonialism and a slave mindset to make a mark not just for himself but also for our entire
country and that too in the field of sciences, which was believed to be the
sole fiefdom of the whites who had loads of money. Raman also broke the myth
that great science can only be practiced and performed in labs that invest loads of money in scientific research. Raman must therefore be considered
as a scientist who deserves to remain alive in the hearts and minds of people
for which his achievements must continue to be hailed and communicated to the
people, particularly to the student community.
Raman and his students developed an indigenous Spectroscope at the IACS some times during the period from 1924 to 27. The path-breaking experiments, which were carried out at the IACS using this instrument, culminated in the publication of the findings of a ‘new light’, which was first published in the renowned international magazine, Nature, in 1928. This very instrument, which won Raman the Nobel Prize, was one of the six precious antiquity objects that were sent from India to be a part of the historic exhibition ‘Illumination India - 5000 years of science and Innovation’ that was exhibited at the London Science Museum from October 2017 to April 2018. Fourteen significant objects of importance were sent for the exhibition from India, which included six antiquity objects - including Raman’s original Spectroscope, and 8 other non-antiquity objects. Yours truly was honoured and privileged to be the national coordinator for this coveted exhibition. The original Raman Spectrometer, which was displayed at this exhibition which is now with the IACS, had 6 different components, namely the Mercury Vapour Lamp, Collimating Lens, the Sample holder, the Collecting lens, and the Violet Filter. It was used by Raman and his students to identify materials that display Raman Scattering, a scattering of light that will depend on the medium through which the light gets scattered and the wavelength of the scattered light will change according to the medium and will be higher or lower in frequency. This was completely a path-breaking finding, which befittingly won Sir, C V Raman the Nobel Prize.
the sound of the veena which
inspired him to try and understand how the musical notes of the veena is
produced and what the significance of the Bridge was in generating the musical
notes in the Veena. His research on Indian musical instruments led him to publication
of several papers including his paper ‘Acoustic Knowledge of Ancient Hindus’.
The first
paper that Raman published, while he was still a student in Madras, was in the
prestigious Philosophical
Magazine, one of the oldest scientific journals in London. Raman had
worked on this paper and sent a copy to one of his professors asking for a
review. Unfortunately, the Professor had not bothered to look at Raman’s paper,
and therefore Raman dared to directly send his paper, under title Unsymmetrical
diffraction-bands due to a rectangular aperture directly to Philosophical Magazine in
London. His paper, which
was about the behaviour of light was accepted by the magazine and was published
in the year 1906 when he
was still a student. Interestingly, Raman received a letter from Lord Rayleigh,
the eminent scientist, addressing Raman as “Professor Raman”, not knowing
that Raman, the author of the paper, was still a student and was just
nineteen years of age.
Raman was able to show conclusively that the colour of the sea was the result of the scattering of sunlight by the water molecules. Raman then became obsessed with the phenomenon of light scattering. Immediately on his return to Calcutta, he and his group began an extensive series of experiments and started measurements of light, scattered primarily by liquids but also by some solids. In less than a year after his return from England - in 1922 - Raman published his work on the “Molecular Diffraction of Light”, the first of a series of investigations with his collaborators, which ultimately led to his ultimate discovery, on the 28th of February, 1928, of the radiation effect which bears his name (“A new radiation”, Indian J. Phys., 2 (1928). One of his collaborator for this work was Dr K S Krishnan, who some people believed must have been recognised equally for the Nobel Prize. As a matter of fact, although Krishnan and others worked with Raman on this subject at the IACS, it was truly Raman who firmly believed that the scattered light was a new radiation, which produced higher or lower frequency in the scattered light depending on the medium through which it passed. In one of the interviews that Krishnan had given, he firmly says that the credit for the discovery must mandatorily go to his teacher and mentor Raman, his guru and that he and his associates were incidental to the path breaking discovery by Raman. Unfortunately, the controversy to pit Raman against Krishnan gained impetus, courtesy some politics, which provided momentum to the issue, after Raman was conferred the Nobel Prize.
It was on the 16th March, 1928 in Bangalore that Raman for the first time talked about their new discovery, in a public function. Raman began his lecture in Bangalore with these prophetic words “I propose this evening to speak to you on a new kind of radiation or light emission from atoms and molecules.” Professor Raman delivered this lecture to the South Indian Science Association in Bangalore. Raman, during the course of his lecture, described the discovery that, according to him, resulted from a deceptively simple experiment. This famous experiment was conducted by Raman and his colleagues at the IACS, Kolkata, far away from those great centres of scientific research in the Western world. Raman and his students had used the simplest of inexpensive equipment for their measurement. Although Raman’s original experiments were done by visual observation, precise measurements were made with their low cost spectrograph. Raman, during the initial experiments, had used only a mercury lamp, a flask of benzene, and a direct vision pocket spectroscope. The results that they obtained went on to capture the attention of scientists around the world and bring many accolades, including the Nobel Prize to Raman.
Raman was known for his immodesty and one such instance, which exhibits his immodesty was witnessed in Calcutta. Raman’s travel to London in 1921 and his interaction with the scientists had ensured that his works at IACS were recognised and Raman was nominated for the Fellowship of the Royal Society, London. He was subsequently elected to this prestigious body in 1924. During one of the reception parties that Raman attended in 1924 in recognition of his election to the coveted FRS, Raman is believed to have famously and immodestly stated that in less than five years he will be awarded the Nobel Prize, which later turned out to be a reality. Raman’s immodesty, his famous ill-tempered, autocratic and “arrogant” approach was probably also responsible for some of the antagonism, which in a way continued to trouble him later in his career. This coupled with politics and parochialism led to Raman’s ouster from the institute he loved most, the IACS. The coveted recognition of Nobel Prize for Raman was the beginning of a long standing rivalry between him and Meghnad Saha another great scientist from Bengal. Saha too was an aspirant for the Nobel Prize, which most unfortunately eluded him. Moreover, Saha had to move out of Calcutta to take the teaching position in Allahabad and it was not until Raman moved out of Calcutta that Saha could return back to his city, Calcutta. Saha believed that Raman was patronising South Indians at the IACS and that was at the cost of the Bengalis. All these incidents were to have a long lasting impact on the relationship between Raman and Saha. The Bengali Bhadralok’s in Calcutta started a movement in the name of Bangla Nationalism to get rid of Raman. The Nobel Prize also added to the accentuated immodest behaviour of Raman, which only complicated the matters. By the end of 1932 the fissures started coming out in the open and there were letters to the editor in the local newspapers against Raman’s management of the IACS and the Palit Professorship. The accusations were that he had only south Indians around himself as scholars, and that physics was given too much prominence, to the exclusion of other sciences. Adding to the allegations were the major grouse that Bengalis were being side-lined in their own state. This ultimately resulted in Raman’s decision to hesitantly move out of Calcutta, the city he had made home, once and for all. In 1932 he permanently shifted to Bangalore after spending 25 long years in Calcutta. Raman was at the receiving end of his behaviour and political opportunism of his detractors even in Bangalore.
By the time Raman left Calcutta, the IACS and the School of Physics in the University of Calcutta had made spectacular progress in several areas. Raman’s stay at Calcutta was a ’golden era' for Physics in India. Several monumental and international quality research was produced in the field of Physics at Calcutta, including works on musical instruments and of course the Raman Effect. In one of the short biographies published on Raman by P. Krishnamurthy, in 1938, he gives a list of about eighty-five students who worked with Raman at Calcutta. He also lists some of the prominent areas in which Raman and his collaborators were engaged in research and the list also includes the number of research papers in these areas which are shown in parentheses. Vibrations and Sound (31); Theory of Musical Instruments (30); Wave-optics (65); Colloids (20); Molecular Scattering of Light (65); X-rays and Electron Diffraction (45); Magnetism and Magneto- optics (40); Electro-optics and Dielectrics (10); Raman Effect (100); Viscosity of Liquids (16); Atomic Spectra (8); Optical and Elastic properties of Solids (20). Krishnamurthy also states that among these published papers Raman was co-author of about 170 papers. It was not just the vast number of papers which are creditworthy but the quality of research was truly international and it caught the attention of the leading scientists of the world.
JN Tata, a benevolent industrialist par excellence and a nationalist with the spirit of humanism, started the Tata Institute (Indian Institute of Science now) in Bangalore in the year 1909. The institute started with three departments, which were primarily focusing on applied sciences. Most of the faculty at the institute were Europeans, primarily the British including the Director of the Institute. In the year 1931, in anticipation of the fact that Sir Martin Fraser, who was the Director of the Institute, was to retire from the post of Director in early 1933, the Tata’s approached the Royal Society, London, and requested them to suggest an appropriate successor to Sir Martin Forster. Rutherford, the Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, who was then the President of the Royal Society, suggested Raman's name. Raman’s name for the post of Director of the Institute was later approved by two selection Committees, one in England and one in India. Raman took over the Directorship of the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) Bangalore in July 1933 shifting his base completely from Calcutta to Bangalore.
When Raman assumed the charge of the Director of the IISC, the institute did not have a Physics Department. Moreover, the research output of the Institute was not significant either by way of quality or quantity. Raman, having been a witness to the quality and quantity of the scientific research that was produced at Calcutta in IACS and the Calcutta University, felt that the IISC had become quite a ‘sleepy place’ where little work was done by a large number of “well paid people". He therefore was in a hurry to act quickly and reorganize the functioning of the Institute so that results could be seen and seen fast. Subconsciously the first thing that came to his mind to improve the situation was to start a Physics Department. He also set out to reorganise the existing Departments including the workshops. This was a time when scientists from Germany were prepared to move out of Germany. He also believed that bringing in non-British European scientists to work for the institute will be beneficial to the restructuring of the Institute. Raman therefore sent out request letters to some of best scientists including to Max Born and Erwin Schrodinger and asked them to visit or even take up long term appointments at the IISc. Although his objectives were for the larger good of the Institute, there was resentment amongst the British faculty in the Institute, against this decision of Raman, to invite non British Europeans as faculty members at IISc. Raman knew that most nations were making attempts to recruit German scientists fleeing the new Nazi regime and therefore he was firmly of the opinion that India too should not lose this opportunity. He therefore had managed to attract Max Born to Bangalore in 1935 on a temporary readership, which Raman intended to convert into a new chair in Mathematical Physics.
The appointment raised hackles among the faculty. An English professor of Electrical Engineering described Born as a “second-rate foreigner”. Others with nationalist commitments wanted an Indian appointed – Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, who was on the IISc council, was campaigning for a Bengali candidate. There was other reason for friction between Raman and his detractors one of which was the resentment building against Raman’s emphasis on physics. Raman had established Physics department even while the institute was facing budget cuts in the era of the Great Depression. Raman had established the physics department with a capital that nearly equaled the combined annual contributions of the Tata’s, the Government of India and the Government of Mysore to the Institute. The resulting reorganization of the other departments, together with an emphasis on hands-on workshop training also caused resentment among the class-conscious faculty members.
The Director of the IISc was to function under the aid and advise of IISC Council, which most unfortunately had several of Raman's detractors, including Professor Meghnad Saha and Shyama Prasad Mukherjee with whom Raman had developed serious differences while at Calcutta. Therefore, Raman’s plans for the improvement of the IISc did not go well with his detractors. His plans to invite non-European scientists, though very well intentioned, became an Achilles heels for Raman and eventually on the issue of appointing Max Born, as Professor of Mathematical Physics, the Council outvoted Raman and got a Review Committee appointed to look into the affairs of the Institute. Here too Raman was at a disadvantage. The Committee mostly consisted of Raman’s detractors and included Sir James Irvine, Vice- Chancellor of St. Andrews University, Dr. S.S. Bhatnagar, Professor of Chemistry in Punjab University, Lahore and Dr. A.H. Mackenzie, Pro-Chancellor of Osmania University. The outcome of the committees finding became a foregone conclusion even before the committee submitted its formal report. When the report was submitted by the committee, it was not at all charitable to Raman and the politics was evident in its report. Shyamaprasad Mukherjee played a role which was diametrically opposite to the patronage that his father provided to Raman. All this led to the inevitable resignation of Raman from the position of the Director of the Institute. Raman was baselessly targeted for some ill doings in the institute. Raman could serve as the Director of the Institute for just around four years from 1933 to 1937. However, Raman continued to work at the institute as Professor of Physics until his retirement in 1948, from the IISc.
Raman had major differences even with Pundit Nehru and he firmly believed that Nehru had his priorities wrong in investing majorly in institutes like the CSIR, which was the brainchild of Bhatnagar. He cautioned Nehru that major investments in CSIR, Atomic Energy etc., will be at the cost of the university research, which he felt would be adversely effected. He coined the phrase “Nehru- Bhatnagar effect” to describe the mushrooming of CSIR laboratories in the 1950s, predicting they would achieve little despite the massive sums spent.
Post his retirement from IISc, Raman spent all his money, time and energy, for the next 22 years of his life, in establishing the Raman Research Institute. The Mysore Maharaja helped him with 11 acres of land for the establishment of the RRI. Raman continued to remain active with his research at RRI and he was also associated with the activities of the Indian Academy of Sciences, an institution, which he had founded in 1934. Raman, apart from his sustained interest in the standard fields of Optics and Acoustics, was also engaged in other areas of science, which included varied topics such as the structure of crystals (especially diamond), the plumage of birds, the colours exhibited by minerals, the colours of flowers, the perception of light by the eye and the theory of hearing, the science of meteorology and so on. Perhaps, the most well-known contribution, which Raman made during this period was on the diffraction of light by high frequency sound waves, now known as the Raman - Nath theory.
Raman did not participate actively in freedom movement nor was he actively engaged in any of the political activities. But then that in no way must take away the merit of his nationalistic feelings. Raman, in one of his interviews has said ‘National awakening has got other fields than politics in which it can show itself. ... I think scientific endeavour has certainly a national value, and I have heard it said that what Indian scientists, particularly physicists have done, has helped more to raise the esteem of India in the world than recent political events.” He made this statement in an interview to the Free Press of India after he was awarded the Nobel Prize. Raman had his own way to show his patriotism. There is also an apocryphal belief that Raman had tears in his eyes while receiving the Nobel Prize at the Nobel Ceremony standing under the Union Jack and not under an Indian Flag.
Raman received many Prizes and honours including the Fellow of the Royal Society (1924), Nobel Prize in Physics (1930), Hughes medal (1930), Franklin Medal (1941), Bharat Ratna (1954), Lenin Peace Prize (1957) and honorary doctorates from several prestigious universities. After serving for eight decades, Raman died of a cardiac arrest on November 21, 1970, at the age of 82. He has left behind a scientific legacy which continues to inspire generations of scientists and the Raman Research Institute (RRI), which he painstakingly built and the Museum within the precincts of the RRI - that he was personally involved in setting up including partaking in the design and commissioning of the wooden cabinets – houses a treasure trove of materials that relate to the life and works of CV Raman. The Raman effect will continue to perpetuate the legend of Raman for eternity. Today, on the occasion of his 133rd birth anniversary let us join in remembering this colossal Indian scientist whose contributions will ever remain etched in golden letters in the annals of history of modern science in India.
May you continue to remain in the hearts and minds of people, Prof Raman.
1 comment:
Very Good information for youngsters to know about him
Post a Comment