Cricket in India is more than a sport—it is a
cultural phenomenon, a unifying force, and a mirror of the nation’s collective
consciousness. As scholar Ashis Nandy famously remarked, “Cricket is an Indian
game accidentally discovered by the English.” Its deep ties to Indian
nationalism, catalysed by cinema, political, and corporate interests, have made
it a powerful tool for unity and identity. However, what should
have been a jubilant and unifying celebration of RCB’s maiden IPL victory in
Bengaluru, has instead turned into a national tragedy. This tragic incident reminds
us of a deeper, more troubling pattern: the erosion of institutional integrity.
The Rs. 25 lakh compensation announced by the Government for the victims’ families is an absolute necessity and must be welcomed, but this should not become a shield to avoid real accountability. The opposition must stop political blame game in circumstances such as this, where precious human lives have been lost. This moment warrants and demands bipartisan resolve to identify failure points and fix the issues — not just for justice today, but to prevent such disasters in the future.
My tryst with the history of the game
of Cricket and its innate connect with the people of India began when curating
three Cricket Connects exhibitions - India South Africa (2014), India Australia
(2016) and India England (2017). The tragic incidence of the loss of lives in
Bengaluru has tempted me to pen this article on Cricket and its popularity in India
and how we must ensure that the game of cricket does not come in the cross fire
of the tragic incident that happened in Bengaluru and how the cash rich cricket
body and its shenanigans invest the money they earn from the game in ensuring
an absolute safety of the people and ensure that they do all that it takes to
see that such incident happens never again.
Cricket and Indian cinema stand
as two dominant mass mediums in India, transcending class, religion, and
regional boundaries to unite a diverse nation of 1.4 billion. From children in
rural hamlets to urban professionals, every Indian is touched by cricket,
rallying with fervour to support their team, especially during high-stakes
events like the World Cup or India-Pakistan clashes. Bollywood has capitalized
on this link, with films like Lagaan—Ashutosh Gowariker’s Academy
Award-nominated film—portraying cricket as a unifying force in pre-independent
India. It is therefore no wonder that Amir Khan the lead in Lagan film, chose
IPL finals between RCB and PBKS to promote his upcoming film “Sitaare
Zameen Par”, joining the
commentary team. The ruling political class in Bengaluru too wished to have their
share of public and media space by joining the victory parade –The CM and Deputy CM were seen with RCB
players celebrating their IPL victory at the Vidhana Soudha. This is not
the first time that political leaders have been a part of such celebrations, Cricket
victory celebrations has always attracted this class alongside other celebrities
from cinema and business all of who depend on each other.
The 1983 Prudential World Cup victory, led by the
legendary Kapil Dev, marked a turning point, catapulting cricket as India’s
most beloved sport. The advent of colour television via Doordarshan during the
1982 Asian Games, followed by economic liberalization in 1991, transformed the
game’s reach. Deregulation of the television industry in 1993 brought private
channels like Star Sports and ESPN, delivering cricket to living rooms
nationwide. Nation ide spread of TV transmitting station and the 50-over format
of the game, with frequent breaks for advertisements, became a goldmine for
broadcasters and corporations. Multinational companies (MNCs) flooded India with
their consumer products, leveraging cricket stars like Sachin Tendulkar and Bollywood
icons like Amitabh Bachchan and others to endorse their products—Pepsi and
Coca-Cola - larger than life billboards
became a common sight, deepening the game’s cultural footprint. The rise of the
Indian Premier League (IPL) in 2008 amplified this, turning cricket into an
intoxicating blend of sport, entertainment, and commerce, an “opium” for a
cricket-crazy nation.
The relationship between cricket and politics in
India is symbiotic and longstanding. Even before independence, the Board of
Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) was formed by maharajas of princely states,
with power brokers backing local boards. The popularity of the Quadrangular and
Pentangular Cricket matches in Mumbai were as popular in the 1930s and early
40s as the IPL now. Even during the freedom struggle the popularity of the tournament
remained untouched with scores of spectators thronging the matches. The games popularity and its possible adverse effects on the
freedom struggle motivated Mahatma Gandhi to publicly appeal for a boycott of
the Bombay Pentangular cricket tournament. He viewed the tournament, which pitted teams representing different
religious communities, as communally divisive and harmful to the broader
national movement.
The popularity of the game remained so even after
Independence. Post-independence, leaders harnessed cricket’s appeal to bolster
their image. Jawaharlal Nehru played the game, and during the 1975 Emergency,
Indira Gandhi used images of her father in cricket whites on political
pamphlets to connect with the masses. Politicians across the spectrum have
since supported cricket, hosting players and funding events, while cricket
boards - mostly made of political class - including the influential BCCI,
navigate red tape and secure resources from the government for the game through
political ties.
This mutual benefit has persisted, with cricket
serving as a platform for political visibility. The 1983 win, combined with
economic reforms, fuelled a growing middle class—standard-bearers of nationalism—who
embraced cricket as a symbol of pride. Media hype, especially during
India-Pakistan matches, and world cup finals stokes hyper-nationalism, framing
games as virtual battles. However, this fervour, while unifying, can spiral out
of control, as seen in Bengaluru, where poor planning and underestimation of
crowd size turned celebration into a catastrophe and a national tragedy.
RCB’s historic IPL victory over Punjab Kings by six
runs in Ahmedabad sparked jubilation in Bengaluru, the Silicon Valley of India.
Wanting to capitalise on this fan frenzy, the RCB planned to have a victory
celebration parade. There were two celebrations planned one at the Vidhana
Soudha and other at the Chinnaswamy stadium. Celebration and felicitation for
the RCB players, arranged at the Vidhana Soudha, was attended by the CM and the
Dy CM, who greeted and felicitated the players and the team. From here the players
were to assemble at the Chinnaswamy stadium.
Estimates suggest 2-3 lakh people converged, trying
to enter the stadium, far exceeding expectations and a capacity of 35000 at the
stadium. Initial plans for a victory parade from Vidhana Soudha to the stadium
were announced on social media post at 3:14 PM, on
RCB's official account on X, on 4 June. It confirmed a "Victory
Parade" scheduled to begin at 5:00 PM from the Vidhana Soudha to the
Chinnaswamy Stadium, followed by a felicitation event inside the stadium. Confusion ensued when the parade
was cancelled, but fans, uninformed and desperate to see the team, surged
toward the stadium, leading to a deadly stampede. Eleven lives were lost—youth,
a woman, and a boy among them—while over 40 were injured.
News reports claiming eyewitness accounts described
chaos, with people climbing trees and buses, and others falling in the crush.
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah admitted the crowd surge was
unanticipated. The Karnataka High Court registered a Suo Moto case, and
Bengaluru Police filed an FIR against RCB, event organizers DNA Entertainment
Networks, and the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) for criminal
negligence. As expected criticism mounted from the opposition, with the BJP decrying
the state government’s “hasty” planning and failure to heed traffic police
warnings about crowd control at Vidhana Soudha.
Exploitation and Accountability
The Bengaluru tragedy exposes how cricket’s
popularity is exploited by multiple stakeholders. Political parties leverage
the game’s mass appeal for clout, with most political leaders joining the
bandwagon in rushing to felicitate victorious teams. The BCCI and IPL
organizers reap billions from sponsorships, ticket sales, and broadcasts, with
MNCs and Bollywood stars amplifying the frenzy through endorsements with
support from political class. Yet, this synergy often overlooks fan safety. The
Mumbai celebration of India’s 2024 T20 World Cup win drew 5 lakh people; a
precedent Bengaluru’s planners could have studied. In an era where AI and data
analytics—tools at home in India’s IT hub—can predict crowd sizes based on
social media buzz, ticket demand, and historical data, the failure to anticipate
3 lakh fans was a glaring lapse.
The Way Forward: Balancing
Passion and Safety
Cricket unites India rallying a diverse 1.4
billion-strong audience specially during World Cups and India Pakistan matches.
It fosters national pride, bridges divide, and fuels dreams. Yet, the Bengaluru
tragedy demands introspection. To avoid such incidents while promoting the game,
stakeholders must ensure;
- Robust
Planning with Technology: Use AI, data analytics, and real-time
monitoring to predict and manage crowd sizes. Bengaluru, an IT hub, should
lead in deploying tech for event safety—drones, CCTV, and crowd-flow
models can prevent bottlenecks, funds should not be a problem with cash
rick BCCI.
- Clear
Communication:
Avoid last-minute changes like parade cancellations without widespread,
timely alerts via social media, radio, and SMS to prevent confusion and
surges.
- Enhanced
Infrastructure:
Stadiums and public spaces need wider entry/exit points, barricades, and
trained security. The Bangalore Metro’s suspension of stations like Cubbon
Park and Vidhana Soudha on June 4 highlights the need for coordinated
transport plans.
- Standard
Operating Procedures (SOPs): Karnataka’s move to formulate SOPs for mega
events is a start. The BCCI, state governments, and event organizers must
enforce strict guidelines, learning from global examples.
- Shared
Responsibility:
Politicians, the BCCI, IPL teams, and corporate sponsors must fund and prioritize
safety, not just profits or popularity. Bollywood stars can use their
influence to promote crowd discipline.
- Fan
Education:
Encourage fans to follow guidelines, respect limits, and prioritize
safety, ensuring celebrations remain joyous.
Cricket embodies India’s spirit—diverse,
passionate, and united. The 2025 tragedy must not dim this light but galvanize
action. As Virat Kohli, “absolutely gutted” by the loss, and fans mourn, let us
honour the fallen by ensuring cricket connects, uplifts, and protects. Only
then can it remain the heartbeat of a cricket-crazy nation.