Hiroshima Nagasaki : Never
Again
Today, August 9, 2025, marks the 80th year of the
atomic bombing of Nagasaki, a sombre milestone in human history. On August 9,
1945, three days after the “Little Boy” uranium bomb devastated the city of Hiroshima,
the United States dropped their second atom bomb, a plutonium-based atomic
bomb, codenamed “Fat Man,” on Nagasaki. This catastrophic event, alongside the
Hiroshima bombing, hastened the end of World War II but left an indelible scar
on humanity, prompting a global resolve to prevent such a tragedy from
recurring. As we commemorate this anniversary, it is time to reflect on the
details of the Nagasaki bombing, the specifics of the “Fat Man” bomb, the
experiences of those involved, and the broader implications for the world
order.
The Nagasaki Bombing and the “Fat
Man”
On August 9, 1945, at 11:02 a.m., the B-29 bomber Bockscar,
piloted by Major Charles W. Sweeney, dropped the “Fat Man” bomb over Nagasaki.
The bomb, a plutonium-239 implosion-type device, had a yield of approximately
21 kilotons of TNT, slightly more powerful than the 15-kiloton “Little Boy”
used on Hiroshima. Unlike Hiroshima, where the bomb detonated almost directly
above the city centre, “Fat Man” exploded 1,650 feet above the Urakami Valley,
a secondary target after cloud cover obscured the primary target, Kokura. The
hilly terrain of Nagasaki partially contained the blast, but the devastation
was still immense.
The “Fat Man” bomb was 10.7 feet long, 5 feet in
diameter, and weighed around 9210 Kg. Its complex implosion design, developed
under the Manhattan Project, required precise engineering to compress the
plutonium core and trigger a nuclear chain reaction. The bomb’s detonation
instantly killed an estimated 35,000–40,000 people, with total deaths reaching
approximately 74,000 by the end of 1945 due to injuries, burns, and radiation
poisoning. The Urakami Valley, an industrial area was obliterated, including
the Urakami Cathedral, a symbol of Nagasaki’s Christian community.
Nagasaki’s unique geography and the bomb’s
off-target detonation mitigated some of the destruction compared to Hiroshima’s
flatter terrain. However, the human toll was staggering. Survivors, known as hibakusha,
faced severe burns, radiation sickness, and long-term health effects like
cancer and leukemia. Artifacts from the bombing—melted glass, charred clothing,
and stopped clocks—bear witness to the instantaneous horror, much like those
preserved from Hiroshima.
Japan’s Surrender
The Nagasaki bombing, combined with Hiroshima’s
destruction and the Soviet Union’s declaration of war on Japan on August 8,
1945, compelled Japan’s leadership to surrender. On August 15, 1945, Emperor
Hirohito announced Japan’s capitulation in a radio broadcast, the first time
most Japanese citizens heard his voice. The formal surrender was signed on
September 2, 1945, aboard the USS Missouri, officially ending World War
II. The dual atomic bombings demonstrated the unprecedented destructive power
of nuclear weapons, forcing Japan to confront the reality of total defeat and
influencing its decision to surrender unconditionally.
The Pilot: Charles W. Sweeney
Major Charles W. Sweeney, a 25-year-old pilot,
commanded Bockscar during the Nagasaki mission. Unlike Colonel Paul
Tibbets, who piloted the Enola Gay for the Hiroshima bombing and
expressed no regret, Sweeney’s reflections reveal a more complex emotional
response. In his 1997 memoir, War’s End: An Eyewitness Account of America’s
Last Atomic Mission, Sweeney described the mission as a military necessity
to end the war and save lives by avoiding a prolonged invasion of Japan.
However, he also expressed unease about the human cost. Sweeney noted the
challenges of the Nagasaki mission, including mechanical issues with Bockscar
and the need to divert to the secondary target due to weather conditions. After
the war, he defended the bombings but acknowledged the haunting images of
destruction, particularly the suffering of civilians. Sweeney’s experience
underscores the moral weight carried by those who executed such missions, even
as they believed in their strategic necessity.
J. Robert Oppenheimer and the
Manhattan Project
J. Robert Oppenheimer, the scientific director of
the Manhattan Project, oversaw the development of both “Little Boy” and “Fat
Man” at Los Alamos, New Mexico. The Nagasaki bombing, as the second use of a
nuclear weapon, deepened Oppenheimer’s growing unease about the destructive
power he had helped unleash. After witnessing the first successful test of a
plutonium bomb (the “Gadget”) at Trinity in July 1945, Oppenheimer famously
quoted the Bhagavad Gita: “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.” The
bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki solidified his concerns about the ethical
implications of nuclear weapons.
By 1947, Oppenheimer became an advocate for
international control of nuclear arms, opposing the development of the more
powerful hydrogen bomb. His vocal stance against nuclear proliferation led to
his 1954 security clearance hearing, where he was accused of disloyalty during
the McCarthy era, a fallout of his efforts to curb the nuclear arms race. The
Nagasaki bombing, in particular, reinforced Oppenheimer’s belief that humanity
must avoid future nuclear conflicts, shaping his later career as a cautionary
voice in the nuclear age.
The Fallout on the World Order
The Nagasaki bombing, alongside Hiroshima,
fundamentally altered the global order. The demonstrated power of nuclear
weapons ushered in the Cold War, defined by a nuclear arms race between the
United States and the Soviet Union. The bombings established the U.S. as the
preeminent global superpower but also introduced a new era of existential fear.
The creation of NATO, the Warsaw Pact, and subsequent nuclear proliferation by
countries like the Soviet Union (1949), the UK (1952), and others stemmed from
the strategic lessons of 1945.
The bombings also spurred international efforts to
control nuclear weapons. The United Nations, founded in 1945, prioritized
non-proliferation, leading to treaties like the Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty (NPT) in 1968 and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) in 1996.
However, India refused to sign these treaties citing its national strategic
interests. The bombings’ legacy continues to shape global security policies,
with nuclear arsenals serving as deterrents while raising the specter of
mutually assured destruction.
Reflections on the 80th
Anniversary
Reflecting on the 80th anniversary of the Nagasaki
bombing, the lessons remain stark. The “Hiroshima-Nagasaki Never Again”
exhibition, which I coordinated in 1998 at the National Science Centre, Delhi,
vividly captured the horrors of nuclear devastation. The Nagasaki panels, like
those for Hiroshima, displayed melted artefacts, survivor testimonies, and
images of the Urakami Valley’s destruction, reinforcing the human cost of
nuclear warfare. Keeping the national policy in mind, I decided to exclude
panels critical of India’s stance on the NPT and CTBT from the exhibition.
During the 75th year of Hiroshima bombing, I had posted a detailed
blog where I have narrated in detail about the exhibition and the National
Science Centre, featuring on the editorial page. This exhibition helped me in
understanding the delicate balance that we have to play as curators, balancing
the decision between national interests and global disarmament efforts.
Nagasaki, like Hiroshima, has rebuilt itself into a
vibrant, modern city, yet the scars of 1945 endure. The Nagasaki Peace Park and
Atomic Bomb Museum stand as reminders of the tragedy, urging humanity to
prioritize peace. The experiences of Sweeney and Oppenheimer highlight the
personal and ethical dilemmas faced by those involved in the bombings, while
the global fallout reshaped international relations.
As we mark this 80th anniversary, let us renew our
commitment to ensuring that nuclear energy serves humanity’s progress—through
medicine, energy, and research—rather than its destruction. May Nagasaki’s
suffering, alongside Hiroshima’s, remain a solemn warning: never again.
Images : Courtesy Wikipaedia and National Science Centre Delhi
No comments:
Post a Comment